login
Header Space

 
 

Re: PF Congestion and state table question

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Sunday, May 11, 2008 - 1:04 pm

Henning Brauer wrote:
Yes, the congestion counter is what I meant. It's increasing at around 
7/s when the traffic we send it now is at peak time, which is about 40% 
of our total traffic that we will be sending to that box. The 
net.inet.ip.ifq.drops counter is increasing at a length of 100/s right 
now, but I'm not at that peak time either. Having those counters at that 
level seemed pretty high to me, but is it the case? Or out of 35-60K 
packets per seconds it's a number that I should not worry about?

As for the ipintrq length, I've tried different values between 1000-3000 
and values between those didn't seem to affect the rate of the PF 
congestion counter.

Thanks
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Stuart Henderson, (Thu May 8, 7:13 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Fri May 9, 9:51 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Sat May 10, 5:13 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Sat May 10, 8:29 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Sun May 11, 12:44 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Sun May 11, 1:04 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Sun May 11, 7:31 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Mon May 12, 3:44 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Tue May 13, 5:57 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Tue May 13, 8:01 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Tue May 13, 11:00 am)
speck-geostationary