As far as I know, pf = no; an http (or ip) proxy = yes.
But, please explain how you expect www.google.com:p2 to work when client
wants www.google.com:p1 (meaning www.google.com:80)?-----Original Message-----
From: Karel Galuska
To: scott <8f27e956@gmail.com>
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: pf change destination port for outgoing traffic
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:46:34 +0200
Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
Delivered-To: 8f27e956@gmail.comany public server on the Internet
----- Original Message -----
From: "scott" <8f27e956@gmail.com>
To: "Karel Galuska"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: pf change destination port for outgoing traffic> When you say, "...b.b.b.b represents every server the client wants," do
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH 0/10] sysfs network namespace support |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
