The standard recommendation for openbsd is to install the stock kernel. For
the applications you've described, the standard recommendation is also to
use packages or ports.Think of OpenBSD as an appliance, and you're good to go.
As a FYI - OpenBSD concentrates on correctness over optimization, and for
most people, the defaults suffice. If you are one of those who need to eke
out that last extra connection for your lamp, be prepared to roll your
sleeves up and work on the source code yourself. Otherwise, you will be
told - use defaults.--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford
learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Ingo Molnar | iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
