Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dusty
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 - 5:51 am

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:44:08PM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote:


Seamonkey?

Also, (for the rest of you on misc) as far as security goes, the
OpenBSD development team are developing OpenBSD. So don't blame them
for the ports maintainer.
Also, go and look at the exploits and security problems in firefox
which mostly have to do with BHO and the like that don't even exist or
work on OpenBSD anyway because OpenBSD in itself is secure.

I use Seamonkey. It works.
Why use Seamonkey? It is more resource friendly than running
Firefox+Thunderbird+whatever.

Regards
Dusty
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Dusty, (Tue Apr 8, 5:51 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Pau, (Tue Apr 8, 6:37 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Zbigniew Baniewski, (Tue Apr 8, 7:34 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Hannah Schroeter, (Tue Apr 8, 7:45 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Zbigniew Baniewski, (Tue Apr 8, 8:21 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Dale Rahn, (Tue Apr 8, 8:44 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Pau, (Tue Apr 8, 10:03 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Zbigniew Baniewski, (Tue Apr 8, 10:52 am)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12 , Marco S Hyman, (Tue Apr 8, 1:39 pm)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Zbigniew Baniewski, (Tue Apr 8, 2:17 pm)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Daniel Horecki, (Tue Apr 8, 2:56 pm)
Re: Firefox 2.0.0.12, Zbigniew Baniewski, (Tue Apr 8, 3:04 pm)