On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 06:46:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Three choices.

quoted text
>

> It is obvious where the developers play.  But it hard to see how some

> fictional model chosen by very small Linux distributions would benefit

> us.

Not sure about amount of time sacrificed each time to prepare new complete

release... but perhaps it could be spared, if the system+packages is

"refreshed" piece-by-piece / month-by-month?
From the users' point of view: no need to reinstall at all - while having

always the latest release (just because there's only that "latest").
Above are my rather theoretical thoughts... not sure, just asking.

--

				pozdrawiam / regards
						Zbigniew Baniewski