On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 06:46:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:

quoted text
> Three choices.
> 
> It is obvious where the developers play.  But it hard to see how some
> fictional model chosen by very small Linux distributions would benefit
> us.

Not sure about amount of time sacrificed each time to prepare new complete
release... but perhaps it could be spared, if the system+packages is
"refreshed" piece-by-piece / month-by-month?

From the users' point of view: no need to reinstall at all - while having
always the latest release (just because there's only that "latest").

Above are my rather theoretical thoughts... not sure, just asking.
-- 
				pozdrawiam / regards

						Zbigniew Baniewski