> AFAIK OpenBSD has 2 releases a year - which means, that devs are trying to
quoted text
> keep the packages and OS itself "fresh". But I'm wondering: wouldn't be in
> such situation reasonable to switch to s.c. "rolling release" model - and
> even more convenient for both devs and users?

OpenBSD has 2 official releases a year, plus a daily snapshot.

Three choices.

It is obvious where the developers play.  But it hard to see how some
fictional model chosen by very small Linux distributions would benefit
us.