Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jesus Sanchez <zexel08@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Monday, April 21, 2008 - 8:04 pm

Jesus Sanchez wrote:

I have been using mrxvt for years. It's also "multi-tabbed". Currently,
I'm running 10 terminals in a single mrxvt process and it is currently
using Size: 2644K, and Res: 4472K and barely touches the CPU. I'm
running a custom compiled version with all the fancy features turned
off. It is extremely fast and reliable; I haven't found anything faster.

-pachl

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Jesus Sanchez, (Mon Apr 21, 12:34 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Clint Pachl, (Mon Apr 21, 8:04 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Cesare Gargano, (Tue Apr 22, 6:02 am)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Jesus Sanchez, (Tue Apr 22, 9:51 am)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Claer, (Mon Apr 21, 2:14 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Arun G Nair, (Tue Apr 22, 1:13 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Claer, (Wed Apr 23, 3:57 am)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, fulvio ciriaco, (Tue Apr 22, 4:57 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Jesus Sanchez, (Tue Oct 21, 3:18 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Kevin Stam, (Tue Oct 28, 9:48 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Timo Myyrä, (Tue Apr 22, 2:25 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Jim Razmus, (Tue Apr 22, 2:58 pm)
Re: aterm, rxvt -- memory usage, Arun G Nair, (Tue Apr 22, 3:11 pm)