Hello,
> I don't know if anyone brought this up, and I hate to state the
not always, bad sectors get only reasigned if either the sector
containing data can still be read after a few tries eg. the drive
notices when reading that this part is going bad or when you write
to the sector. in case you stumble upon a bad sector and just try
to read it, nothing will happen. write it and it will get reasigned.
with the current drive-capacities and data densities bad sectors are
kind of "unavoidable" in consumer grade drives. that's why it is
recommended to read scan your raid of cheap drives often, so the
drives have a chance to discover sectors going bad when they are
still readable.
currently we just take drives with some bad sectors out of the raid,
write check them, see if they are gone, mark them and use them again.
if it happens again after that they go out for warranty. of course
not for really important data, there it's SAS or fresh drives. ;)
-sm
| Sunil Naidu | Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc6 |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Chris Snook | Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH 10/11] avoid kobject name conflict with different namespaces |
