Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: OpenBSD-Misc <misc@...>
Date: Sunday, April 20, 2008 - 5:19 am

Hello,

> I don't know if anyone brought this up, and I hate to state the

not always, bad sectors get only reasigned if either the sector
containing data can still be read after a few tries eg. the drive
notices when reading that this part is going bad or when you write
to the sector. in case you stumble upon a bad sector and just try
to read it, nothing will happen. write it and it will get reasigned.

with the current drive-capacities and data densities bad sectors are
kind of "unavoidable" in consumer grade drives. that's why it is
recommended to read scan your raid of cheap drives often, so the
drives have a chance to discover sectors going bad when they are
still readable.

currently we just take drives with some bad sectors out of the raid,
write check them, see if they are gone, mark them and use them again.
if it happens again after that they go out for warranty. of course
not for really important data, there it's SAS or fresh drives. ;)

-sm

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, ropers, (Fri Apr 18, 2:44 pm)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Jon Simola, (Fri Apr 18, 5:14 pm)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Travers Buda, (Sat Apr 19, 12:41 am)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Siegbert Marschall, (Sun Apr 20, 5:19 am)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Travers Buda, (Sun Apr 20, 12:14 pm)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Siegbert Marschall, (Sun Apr 20, 8:38 pm)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Travers Buda, (Sun Apr 20, 10:21 pm)
Re: Is there a "badblocks"-equivalent for OpenBSD?, Steve Shockley, (Fri Apr 18, 7:49 pm)