Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » April » 19

Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Edwin Eyan Moragas <haaktu@...>
To: Eric Faurot <eric@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance
Date: Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 4:38 am

Hi Eric,


On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Eric Faurot  wrote:


i've been looking also at libevent and libev, both of which are excellent

libraries. however, i'm more interested in simpler system calls rather

than the libraries.


thank you for pointing this out. interesting that openbsd has libevent

as a standard library.


>


--

garnet:jasmin:beryllium:gluon

90-12264

90-B
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 1:27 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Henning Brauer, (Mon Apr 21, 8:31 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Apr 21, 10:43 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Gilles Chehade, (Mon Apr 21, 5:05 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Niels Provos, (Wed Apr 23, 11:31 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Marco Peereboom, (Sat Apr 26, 1:53 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Jonathan Schleifer, (Sat Apr 19, 5:43 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Marc Espie, (Mon Apr 21, 8:38 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Mon Apr 21, 9:49 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 11:29 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Eric Faurot, (Sat Apr 19, 4:17 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 4:38 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance , Theo de Raadt, (Sat Apr 19, 1:50 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 2:46 am)