Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » April » 19

poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Edwin Eyan Moragas <haaktu@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance
Date: Saturday, April 19, 2008 - 1:27 am

Hi all,


been reading the select(2) man pages and it mentions poll(2)

being more efficient in most cases. this makes it obvious to

discard the use of select(2) in writing new servers.


i've come across some performance benchmarks which is trying

to use kqueue(2).


the question is, which one is more useful when writing new servers?

kqueue or poll?


--

garnet:jasmin:beryllium:gluon

90-12264

90-B
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 1:27 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Henning Brauer, (Mon Apr 21, 8:31 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Apr 21, 10:43 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Gilles Chehade, (Mon Apr 21, 5:05 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Niels Provos, (Wed Apr 23, 11:31 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Marco Peereboom, (Sat Apr 26, 1:53 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Jonathan Schleifer, (Sat Apr 19, 5:43 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Marc Espie, (Mon Apr 21, 8:38 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Mon Apr 21, 9:49 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 11:29 pm)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Eric Faurot, (Sat Apr 19, 4:17 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 4:38 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance , Theo de Raadt, (Sat Apr 19, 1:50 am)
Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance, Edwin Eyan Moragas, (Sat Apr 19, 2:46 am)