Re: 4.3 mips version?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 5:56 pm

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:20:00PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:

This is an issue that has always confused me. It is obvious that the
binaries for OpenBSD must be different for each cpu architecture, but
why are they sometimes different for machines that have the same cpu
architecture?

For example, there are different binaries for OpenBSD on hp300 and
mvme68k machines, even though they both have a Motorola 680x0 cpu.
There are also different binaries for zaurus and armish machines, even
though they both have an ARM cpu. Why?

Is it because these machines have limited memory, and there is only room
for those drivers that are needed by the specific machine, or is there
something more subtle going on?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4.3 mips version?, John N. Brahy, (Thu Apr 17, 4:41 pm)
Re: 4.3 mips version? , Theo de Raadt, (Thu Apr 17, 5:20 pm)
Re: 4.3 mips version?, Don Koch, (Thu Apr 17, 5:58 pm)
Re: 4.3 mips version?, Matthew Szudzik, (Thu Apr 17, 5:56 pm)
Re: 4.3 mips version? , Theo de Raadt, (Thu Apr 17, 6:09 pm)
Re: 4.3 mips version?, Paul de Weerd, (Thu Apr 17, 5:05 pm)
SGI install -current: autoboot failed, John N. Brahy, (Thu Apr 17, 6:42 pm)
Re: SGI install -current: autoboot failed, Joel Sing, (Fri Apr 18, 1:01 pm)
Re: SGI install -current: autoboot failed, Olaf Schreck, (Wed Apr 23, 9:10 am)
Re: SGI install -current: autoboot failed, Miod Vallat, (Wed Apr 23, 10:44 am)
Re: SGI install -current: autoboot failed, Joel Sing, (Wed Apr 23, 10:31 am)
Re: 4.3 mips version?, Josh Grosse, (Thu Apr 17, 5:03 pm)