I believe it was mentioned aways back in the message stream, but perhaps
it's worth reconsidering at this juncture...Keep the low emi/rfi 386 machine user-proximity but convert it to an X
server with the more capable X client (app server) machine farther away.-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas A. Tutty
To: misc
Subject: Re: configuring the GENERIC kernel (was Re: Issue compiling a
program on OpenBSD)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:12:57 -0400
Mailer: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Delivered-To: 8f27e956@gmail.comOn Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:04:09PM +0300, Lars Nood??n wrote:
I know that other distros have dropped actual 386 CPUs from their
supported list so that i386 actually needs minimum 486. The reasoning
I've heard is that the amount of memory required is too much for any
remaining actual 386 boxes to actually have.
I know that my old PS/2 Model 70-A21 was a 386 with 4 MB Ram (at $1K per
MB) and I think it could take a maximum 16 MB (but my memory from 1988
is very fuzzy). Where there any 386 boxes that could take 32MB ram, and
do any still exist?
Doug.
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Tomasz Kłoczko | Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ? |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Paweł Staszewski | iproute2 action/policer question |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
