On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> 2) One thing that may not be visible enough is that config(8) can be
One thing I'm not clear on: if the only issue is kernel size based on
having an old box with low memory, where every MB counts, does
deactivating unnecessary drivers with config actually result in a
smaller kernel or just a kernel with deactivated drivers? Shrinking the
kernel would be the only reason I would have of touching the kernel as
I'm not into trying out experimental features. It would be too bad if
config doesn't do this.
Doug.
| Cliffe | Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Radu Rendec | Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
git: | |
