I'm quite well aware of that,... I've been building embedded UNIX-like
systems for 10years now.The main reason I want to use the OpenBSD kernel is I'm interested in
using OpenBGP/OpenOSPF and really don't fancy porting both to
GNU/Linux and also brokering a truce between Theo and Linus, so that I
can do this port without license conflicts.
(Mmmmmmmmm wonder what the chances are that I could get that right in
the first place???)It appears that the error I was experiencing earlier is due to GNU
extensions to libc being called that are not present in the OpenBSD
libc. Can someone confirm this?On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Stephano Zanzin
wrote:
> OpenBSD kernel is not Linux.
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5.9M Feb 22 10:56 bsd
>
> You only have to remove the tools that you don't need.
>
> Stephano Zanzin--
I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind.
Some come from ahead and some from behind.
But I've bought a big bat. I'm all ready you see.
Now my troubles are going to have toubles with me!
-- Dr. Seuss
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
