Re: BSD Documentation License?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ted Walther <ted@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 10:27 am

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:26:09AM -0700, Ted Walther wrote:

Then as I understand it your interpretation is correct: the original
works are in the public domain, and your performance and derived works
are copyright by you.

> I'm a believer in freedom. I don't want to restrict anyone from using

If you truly wish to relinquish ALL rights then public domain is exactly
that. This is obviously the most free.

If additionally you wish to retain attribution only then
/usr/src/share/misc/license.template is a great choice. This is probably
the most free except for public domain.

If it bothers you if Microsoft uses your performance in a Vista ad then
you must pick something else. But now you are in a sticky place where
you want to share except when you don't. The available licenses are
tricky legalese, and finding one to match your motives is difficult and
the license may have consequences you don't anticipate.

--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Theo de Raadt, (Thu Mar 27, 3:57 am)
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Ted Walther, (Thu Mar 27, 4:26 am)
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Darrin Chandler, (Thu Mar 27, 10:27 am)
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Stefan Krah, (Thu Mar 27, 7:16 am)