Ted Walther wrote:
Printed sheet music of public domain content is indeed copyrightable.
The copyright does not apply to the content, but to the presentation.
This makes sense, because (at least with classical music) a lot of
effort goes into transcribing, researching the original manuscripts,
adding performance hints and typesetting [1].
I think that the above is also valid if you transcribe from old
sheet music instead of the original manuscripts, so I'd say that
you could copyright the PDF.
Since the midi, ogg and mp3 files reflect the pure content without
any human interpretation, I doubt that they are copyrightable.
I would publish the PDF with a preface, citing the original sources
and outlining the changes that were made. This is common practice.
If you then choose the standard copyright, people will still be
able to make their own compilations from your work.
If you want to encourage direct reuse, why not put the PDF into
the public domain and ask people to credit you if they make
modifications?
I wouldn't use any of the documentation licenses. Those licenses
are for works where you are the original creator, not for transcriptions.
Stefan Krah
[1] Unfortunately, the art of typesetting is on a steady decline, but that
is another topic.
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
