login
Header Space

 
 

Re: BSD Documentation License?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 7:16 am

Ted Walther <ted@reactor-core.org> wrote:

Printed sheet music of public domain content is indeed copyrightable.
The copyright does not apply to the content, but to the presentation.
This makes sense, because (at least with classical music) a lot of
effort goes into transcribing, researching the original manuscripts,
adding performance hints and typesetting [1].

I think that the above is also valid if you transcribe from old
sheet music instead of the original manuscripts, so I'd say that
you could copyright the PDF.

Since the midi, ogg and mp3 files reflect the pure content without
any human interpretation, I doubt that they are copyrightable.


I would publish the PDF with a preface, citing the original sources
and outlining the changes that were made. This is common practice.

If you then choose the standard copyright, people will still be
able to make their own compilations from your work.

If you want to encourage direct reuse, why not put the PDF into
the public domain and ask people to credit you if they make
modifications?


I wouldn't use any of the documentation licenses. Those licenses
are for works where you are the original creator, not for transcriptions.



Stefan Krah


[1] Unfortunately, the art of typesetting is on a steady decline, but that
is another topic.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Theo de Raadt, (Thu Mar 27, 3:57 am)
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Ted Walther, (Thu Mar 27, 4:26 am)
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Darrin Chandler, (Thu Mar 27, 10:27 am)
Re: BSD Documentation License?, Stefan Krah, (Thu Mar 27, 7:16 am)
speck-geostationary