Ted Walther wrote:

quoted text
> [snip]

>> (The 2/3-term BSD license meant to do basically the same, but it used

>> more words to do the same.  The old 4-term BSD license included some

>> terms to make University of California benefit from advertising, if

>> there was going to be any.)

>

> I have been generating midi, ogg, pdf, and mp3 files of some old,

> out-of-copyright music.  I have been releasing them and the source that

> generates them under the Creative Commons license.

> Do you recommend the 3 term BSD license for this particular use instead?

> Or would the 2 term one be better?

The BSD license is about using copyright, for which I believe you have

no claim in the media files you mention.