[snip]

quoted text
>(The 2/3-term BSD license meant to do basically the same, but it used

>more words to do the same.  The old 4-term BSD license included some

>terms to make University of California benefit from advertising, if

>there was going to be any.)

I have been generating midi, ogg, pdf, and mp3 files of some old,

out-of-copyright music.  I have been releasing them and the source that

generates them under the Creative Commons license.
Do you recommend the 3 term BSD license for this particular use instead?

Or would the 2 term one be better?
[snip]

quoted text
>Please avoid using that creativecommons bullshit for anything -- it it

>tries to hide the fundamentals and simplicity of basic copyright law

>behind the massive complexity of US-centric contract law and the

>various terminology normally tied to tit for tat.  In the end,

>creativecommons licenses will only ever truly benefit one group of

>people on this planet: The lawyers.

[snip]

quoted text
>And that is  exactly what creativecommons tries to  do.  2300 words to

>say "you must say I wrote it"?  There is only one reason it could take

>2300 words: The goal is to deceive.

Amen brother.  Tell it like it is.
Ted
--

	   There's a party in your skull.  And you're invited!
Name:    Ted Walther

Phone:   604-435-5787

Email:   ted@enumera.com

Skype:   tederific

Address: 3422 Euclid Ave basement, Vancouver, BC V5R4G4 (Canada)