On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:49:53AM -0600, Will Maier wrote:
> You don't get it. This system isn't for you, even if you donate a
OK - as I understand, it's the answer for my question: "Are they willing to
take a suggestions from the users side".
> Time and again, the people who make it have very clearly explained that
Yes, there's no point in making silly changes.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
