Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » November » 10

Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: frantisek holop <minusf@...>
To: <misc@...>
Cc: Francisco Valladolid Hdez. <ficovh@...>
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?
Date: Monday, November 10, 2008 - 6:46 am

hmm, on Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Marc Balmer said that


could you give some examples please?


1.3 has some serious limitations stemming from it's overall

architecture and in some cases scales reaaaaly bad.

getting slashdotted with 1.3 is quite easy on openbsd,

esp without sendfile(2), but esp with dynamic content (php).


heck, it is easy even with 2.0 on linux with the prefork model...


-f

--

it is always dark if you don't open your eyes.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, Francisco Valladolid Hdez...., (Sat Nov 8, 1:40 am)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, raven, (Sat Nov 8, 6:39 am)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, Marc Balmer, (Sat Nov 8, 4:17 am)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, frantisek holop, (Mon Nov 10, 6:46 am)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, Francisco Valladolid Hdez...., (Sat Nov 8, 1:45 pm)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, David Schulz, (Mon Nov 10, 2:45 am)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, Francisco Valladolid Hdez...., (Mon Nov 10, 1:51 pm)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, Hannah Schroeter, (Sat Nov 8, 2:12 pm)
Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?, Pereresus ne Vlezaet Buggy..., (Sat Nov 8, 4:12 am)