Re: New tcp stack attack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 12:56 pm

Fernando Gont wrote:

I listened to the podcast and got the idea that the socket is in
ESTABLISHED state (so after 3 way handshake) and they
mention that a packets PCB resources have timers, and that is what they
exploit. Perhaps you establish the session and
send an HTTP request (pretend it's http) and never ACK the answer that
gets repeated based on the internal timers. It seemed to me they say
that some stop repeating their content and just die.

-p

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
New tcp stack attack, Leon Dippenaar, (Wed Oct 1, 8:52 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Jussi Peltola, (Wed Oct 1, 11:56 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Wed Oct 1, 10:13 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Fernando Gont, (Wed Oct 1, 11:24 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Wed Oct 1, 11:41 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Fernando Gont, (Wed Oct 1, 12:26 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Peter J. Philipp, (Wed Oct 1, 12:56 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Sunnz, (Fri Oct 3, 12:18 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Fernando Gont, (Wed Oct 1, 1:31 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Peter J. Philipp, (Wed Oct 1, 2:11 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Brian Keefer, (Wed Oct 1, 10:37 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Stephan A. Rickauer, (Wed Oct 1, 9:31 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Claudio Jeker, (Wed Oct 1, 9:58 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Paul de Weerd, (Wed Oct 1, 10:46 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Wed Oct 1, 10:22 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Dries Schellekens, (Wed Oct 1, 10:47 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Dries Schellekens, (Wed Oct 8, 7:12 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Alexander Sabourenkov, (Wed Oct 1, 10:44 am)