Re: New tcp stack attack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Duncan Patton a Campbell <campbell@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 12:26 pm

At 12:41 p.m. 01/10/2008, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:

> > This is simply the naphta attack. They don't really need to "use syn

According to a podcast I listened to, this is not what they try to
do. And even then, brute force attacks against SYN cookies have
already been discussed in the past. (although I agree that it usually
requires hard googling to spot the right documentation)

Kind regards,

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
New tcp stack attack, Leon Dippenaar, (Wed Oct 1, 8:52 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Jussi Peltola, (Wed Oct 1, 11:56 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Wed Oct 1, 10:13 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Fernando Gont, (Wed Oct 1, 11:24 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Wed Oct 1, 11:41 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Fernando Gont, (Wed Oct 1, 12:26 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Peter J. Philipp, (Wed Oct 1, 12:56 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Sunnz, (Fri Oct 3, 12:18 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Fernando Gont, (Wed Oct 1, 1:31 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Peter J. Philipp, (Wed Oct 1, 2:11 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Brian Keefer, (Wed Oct 1, 10:37 pm)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Stephan A. Rickauer, (Wed Oct 1, 9:31 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Claudio Jeker, (Wed Oct 1, 9:58 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Paul de Weerd, (Wed Oct 1, 10:46 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Wed Oct 1, 10:22 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Dries Schellekens, (Wed Oct 1, 10:47 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Dries Schellekens, (Wed Oct 8, 7:12 am)
Re: New tcp stack attack, Alexander Sabourenkov, (Wed Oct 1, 10:44 am)