On Jan 08 00:13:19, Reid Nichol wrote:
Are you deaf or what? NOBODY CARES whether you "endorse" (or
"recommend"? or "suggest"?) OpenBSD, nobody asks for that, and nobody
wants it. OpenBSD's goals and policies are clearly stated on the
project's web page, and whether they are consistent with "being on RMS's
list" is a non-issue on here, at best.
You have made your non-point a THOUSAND TIMES already: OpenBSD
has a ports system, which lets you install non-free software.
(that's true, and nobody has a problem with that; unlike your
medialized statement that obsd contains non-free software).
So having made your non-point, why don't go away now?
No really, WHY?
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.26-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
git: | |
