--- Richard Stallman wrote:
You're confusing full understanding with an intuitive meaning. People
can "get" what's going on at a high level, without having a "wtf" when
looking at the details, because the spirit of "free" is retained. The
details merely being the implements.
But, with your usage, this is not retained, AGAIN, see below.
> But, if I'm wrong (which is possible), please tell me how I can
Thus the combined work, THE WHOLE POINT OF WRITING IT, is under the
GPL. That IS what you just said. Which is forcing me into a license
for my project that I don't want. How does that equal freedom for me
again?
Are you deliberately missing the point?
best regards,
Reid Nichol
President Bush says:
War Is Peace
Freedom Is Slavery
Ignorance Is Strength
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Fred Tyler | Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
