On Jan 7, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Richard, should we expect a contribution to the project for the
Yes, this was gratuitous and irrelevant to my point, so I apologize.
> and I cannot take time from you. However, if you
And this misses my point entirely. I'm not asking you to pay me, and
you're under no obligation to pay anybody. However, in the quote of
yours that I presented in my previous post you made a point of how
valuable your time was and how it was not for others to dispose of,
thus justifying your request for contributions to your cause in return.
Perhaps my time is worthless to you. Perhaps my time isn't of much
value to the project either. However, there are a lot of people who
read this list, and over the past few weeks a large amount of our
time has been taken up by this little train wreck of yours. A good
number of the people whose time you've taken (and you have, despite
your claim to the contrary) are important to this project, and that
would seem to indicate that this time has been taken from the project
itself.
So, regardless of how you feel about my time, if you value the
project as you've stated, it seems to me that it is not unreasonable
to expect that a contribution is in order. You can of course do as
you wish. You are certainly _free_ to not contribute or contribute as
you see fit, but please keep in mind that our time is not yours to
dispose of either.
-Jonathan
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Adrian Bunk | [1/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
