Alexander Terekhov wrote:
I'm not against buying grapes from people, as long as they are free
grapes. That means the grapes cannot be restricted through seedless
scams, or by scams that demand payment of the grapes themselves. By
offering seedless grapes to people - we cannot grow and replicate our
own grapes freely. But 99 percent of seedless grape buyers and shareware
buyers don't care. It is all in your mind that only software replication
freedom is important. It is all in your mind. You should take your GNU
sunglasses off.
> "With free software, users don't have to pay the distribution fee in
One can still hold people hostage for consulting. Instead of recording
the consulting on audio tapes that are easy to copy, one simply
restricts the consulting by only offering it to those who can pay.
Instead of speaking to people and using your free voice which does not
cost you any money, simply demand payment before saying a word.
Especially on cruise ships which are terrible places to speak. Or
pretend you are charging for the airline ticket, not the speech itself.
This loop hole makes all software non-free, since free consulting is not
available to those who cannot afford to pay someone on cruise ships and
watch me insert flowers into my nose for pleasure.
| David Miller | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 13/37] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl |
