login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Richard Stallman...

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Richard Stallman <rms@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 - 11:46 am

No, Richard. No. This is really getting tired.


No, you didnt't.


No, you used words which were lies.


No you didn't, people only called you on your bullshit.


Jesus Christ already ...


Yes. So WHAT?


Listen, you lying, hypocrytic asshole: OpenBSD does contain ports that
let you install non-free software. That does not make OpenBSD non-free
in any sensible sense of the word. In your eyes, it does, right? And
that's why you don't "recommend" OpenBSD (which nobody gives a flying
fuck about). Yet you do recommend gNewsense and whatnot, which too
contains ports to install non-free software; because in _this_ case, it
doesn't make the system non-free. Right? That makes your whole criteria
irrelevant, because they are self-contracictory. PERIOD.

I don't believe that you are so stupid to not understand that.

Pretty fucking please, realize the following:

0. Nobody in the OpenBSD project gives a fuck about whether you
   "recommend" OpenBSD (whatever that word means to you today),
   because it doesn't make any difference. Heck, it doesn't change
   anything if you DO recommend OpenBSD.

1. OTOH, the OpenBSD people do care a lot whether you spread lies
   about OpenBSD in interviews.

2. Nobody on this list is gonna buy your double standard of meassuring
   the "freeness" of a given system. Your posts to this list lack any
   point since long ago.

3. Not even reading the few pages of a given system's policies
   and then repeating your lying propaganda on the very system's mailing
   list is total lack of respect to people who make that system (which
   is not me, btw).

4. Not even launching a browser when people ask you to just read a damn
   webpage (please do not elaborate, nobody cares why) makes you look like
   a fucking moron.

5. There are people who need to actually read this mailing list, and you
   drown it in bullshit.
   
Please read the above point over and over until you finally understand
that there is not point whatsoever sending any more posts to this list.
After you get it, please do the following:

(a) Send your last message, with a subject of "RMS - apology" (so that
    I can filter out any other message from you), saying, "I was
    a fucking moron. Plese forgive me, I will shut up now and not bother
    this list again".

(b) Read all the documentation you can find on http://openbsd.org
    (if it's impossible for you to use a browser, have the whole thing
    printed out and read it on paper).

(c) Please kindly consider shutting the fuck up already
    and never comming back.

	sincerely yours

		jan
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Richard Stallman..., Mayuresh Kathe, (Fri Jan 4, 10:05 am)
Re: Richard Stallman... , Theo de Raadt, (Fri Jan 4, 1:08 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Richard Stallman, (Sat Jan 5, 10:31 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Craig Skinner, (Mon Jan 7, 6:21 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., johan beisser, (Sat Jan 5, 11:30 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Richard Stallman, (Sun Jan 6, 6:46 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Duncan Patton a Campbell, (Mon Jan 7, 6:32 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., johan beisser, (Sun Jan 6, 2:42 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Richard Stallman, (Mon Jan 7, 7:30 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Eric Furman, (Tue Jan 8, 3:48 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Jan Stary, (Mon Jan 7, 11:46 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., nicodache, (Mon Jan 7, 1:32 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Steve Shockley, (Mon Jan 7, 6:41 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., knitti, (Tue Jan 8, 9:25 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gregg Reynolds, (Tue Jan 8, 12:22 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Alexander Hall, (Tue Jan 8, 8:34 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Dusty, (Sun Jan 6, 9:10 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Marco Peereboom, (Sat Jan 5, 1:39 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., johan beisser, (Sat Jan 5, 2:53 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Sunnz, (Sat Jan 5, 11:24 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Richard Stallman, (Sun Jan 6, 6:47 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Sun Jan 6, 8:48 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Richard Stallman, (Mon Jan 7, 12:18 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Jacob Meuser, (Mon Jan 7, 9:07 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., johan beisser, (Mon Jan 7, 1:02 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Mon Jan 7, 3:43 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Richard Stallman, (Mon Jan 7, 1:15 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Mon Jan 7, 11:29 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Mon Jan 7, 11:46 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rico Secada, (Tue Jan 8, 2:07 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Jacob Meuser, (Mon Jan 7, 8:24 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Mon Jan 7, 11:20 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Andrés, (Sat Jan 5, 11:30 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gilles Chehade, (Sat Jan 5, 10:51 am)
Re: Richard Stallman... , Maxim Bourmistrov, (Fri Jan 4, 5:32 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Siju George, (Fri Jan 4, 2:09 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., chefren, (Fri Jan 4, 2:31 pm)
Puffy 'Wizard of OS' (Was: Re: Richard Stallman...), Ken Ismert, (Fri Jan 4, 5:54 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Fri Jan 4, 10:29 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gilles Chehade, (Fri Jan 4, 7:49 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 7:53 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gilles Chehade, (Sat Jan 5, 10:47 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 1:53 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., William Boshuck, (Sat Jan 5, 4:05 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Eliah Kagan, (Sat Jan 5, 2:51 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 4:54 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Eliah Kagan, (Sat Jan 5, 8:46 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 9:31 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gary Baluha, (Mon Jan 7, 11:10 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gilles Chehade, (Sat Jan 5, 2:34 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 8:56 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gary Baluha, (Mon Jan 7, 11:04 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Gilles Chehade, (Sun Jan 6, 8:18 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., johan beisser, (Sat Jan 5, 9:22 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Marco Peereboom, (Sat Jan 5, 8:34 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 9:10 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Ray Percival, (Sat Jan 5, 2:28 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 9:07 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Alexander Terekhov, (Sat Jan 5, 2:52 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Sat Jan 5, 2:31 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 9:06 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Sat Jan 5, 9:18 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jan 5, 9:34 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Sat Jan 5, 11:30 pm)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Sun Jan 6, 12:28 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Lars Noodén, (Sun Jan 6, 12:17 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., L, (Sun Jan 6, 12:41 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Koh Choon Lin, (Sun Jan 6, 4:58 am)
Re: Richard Stallman..., Eric Furman, (Tue Jan 8, 2:07 pm)
speck-geostationary