No, Richard. No. This is really getting tired.
> Their report was that OpenBSD contains ports for non-free programs,

quoted text
> and that is what I tried to say in the interview.

No, you didnt't.
> I made a mistake in the way I said it: I used words which were subject

quoted text
> to misunderstanding.

No, you used words which were lies.
> I have acknowledged this mistake here, and had

quoted text
> it corrected, and said so here.

No you didn't, people only called you on your bullshit.
>     > In OpenBSD the recommendation for certain non-free programs

quoted text
>     > is in the recipes for installing them.

Jesus Christ already ...
> I could ask someone to find a specific URL, but why take the trouble?

quoted text
> The OpenBSD developers have acknowledged that contains ports for

> non-free programs.  There is no dispute about that question.

Yes. So WHAT?
>     In gNewsense the recommendation for certain non-free programs is in

quoted text
>     the _inclusion_ of such non-free parts in their distribution

>

> You have not presented any evidence that there are non-free programs

> in gNewSense.

Listen, you lying, hypocrytic asshole: OpenBSD does contain ports that

let you install non-free software. That does not make OpenBSD non-free

in any sensible sense of the word. In your eyes, it does, right? And

that's why you don't "recommend" OpenBSD (which nobody gives a flying

fuck about). Yet you do recommend gNewsense and whatnot, which too

contains ports to install non-free software; because in _this_ case, it

doesn't make the system non-free. Right? That makes your whole criteria

irrelevant, because they are self-contracictory. PERIOD.
I don't believe that you are so stupid to not understand that.
Pretty fucking please, realize the following:
0. Nobody in the OpenBSD project gives a fuck about whether you

   "recommend" OpenBSD (whatever that word means to you today),

   because it doesn't make any difference. Heck, it doesn't change

   anything if you DO recommend OpenBSD.
1. OTOH, the OpenBSD people do care a lot whether you spread lies

   about OpenBSD in interviews.
2. Nobody on this list is gonna buy your double standard of meassuring

   the "freeness" of a given system. Your posts to this list lack any

   point since long ago.
3. Not even reading the few pages of a given system's policies

   and then repeating your lying propaganda on the very system's mailing

   list is total lack of respect to people who make that system (which

   is not me, btw).
4. Not even launching a browser when people ask you to just read a damn

   webpage (please do not elaborate, nobody cares why) makes you look like

   a fucking moron.
5. There are people who need to actually read this mailing list, and you

   drown it in bullshit.
Please read the above point over and over until you finally understand

that there is not point whatsoever sending any more posts to this list.

After you get it, please do the following:
(a) Send your last message, with a subject of "RMS - apology" (so that

    I can filter out any other message from you), saying, "I was

    a fucking moron. Plese forgive me, I will shut up now and not bother

    this list again".
(b) Read all the documentation you can find on http://openbsd.org

    (if it's impossible for you to use a browser, have the whole thing

    printed out and read it on paper).
(c) Please kindly consider shutting the fuck up already

    and never comming back.
	sincerely yours
		jan