Except, sir, at some point, someone made a mistake. And this mistake
has blown up in to this thread with this ongoing argument. Their
report was either not as accurate as you seem to think, or you're very
badly expressing the contents of the report (which has not been made
available to the OpenBSD community).Their report was that OpenBSD contains ports for non-free programs,
and that is what I tried to say in the interview.I made a mistake in the way I said it: I used words which were subject
to misunderstanding. I have acknowledged this mistake here, and had
it corrected, and said so here.Did you miss those messages?
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| DervishD | ext2 on flash memory |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Rob Landley | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Joakim Tjernlund | ucc_geth: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. |
