This has been discussed many times
and it shouldn't take long for you or your minions to find out that we do not
care about the source of firmware which doesn't load into OpenBSD.The people who do searches for me are helpful volunteers. I can ask
them to look for something, but I try not to impose on them if there
is an easier way. For a question about OpenBSD policies, it is better
for me to ask this list for the answer, than to ask someone else to
hunt for the answer.Thanks for stating the policy.
If I understand that correctly, it means that OpenBSD does distribute
binary-only firmware, which isn't free. This would be a second reason
why I should not endorse OpenBSD. The systems I endorse try to
exclude such firmware.
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
