>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:26:35 -0800 (PST)
> Reid Nichol <rnichol_rrc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > --- Tony Abernethy <tony@servacorp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:21:14 -0500
> > > > "Eliah Kagan" <degeneracypressure@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > (There are also multiple useful,
> > > > > mutually-inconsistent formal systems in both fields.)
> > > >
> > > > Provably so?
> > > >
> > > Euclidean and ono-Euclidian geometries should suffice.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Google (including scholar.g) gave nothing of value (I see 4 results
> > when I search for ono-Euclidean on g and nothing on scholar.g). Any
> > specific references? Or something else that would yield results.
> >
>
>
> ono-Euclidian appears to reference something by Omar Kayam, an 11th c
> Iranian _POET_. If we are to allow the arg. that Creationism
> is science,
> we might allow that such an "inconsistency" has meaning.
>
> Dhu
>
>
> > best regards,
> > Reid Nichol
> >
> > President Bush says:
> >
> > War Is Peace
> > Freedom Is Slavery
> > Ignorance Is Strength
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> >
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
