Quick question, do we really need an endorsement from Richard Stallman and the
FSF for OpenBSD? When I choose an OS I don't go to Richard and the FSF, I
choose the OS I want to use whether its Kubuntu or PCLinuxOS for the desktop
(with all the non-free software that makes my heart sing), OpenBSD for my
server and NetBSD for my Firewall. I never consulted anyone on my two
Windows machines either, Richard Stallman and the FSF have NEVER endorsed a
BSD or UNIX system, so why should that change now? I'm sure some of you care
what Richard and the FSF think but in the long run. Does it really matter?
To me this thread has spiraled out of control with no give or take from
either side and its equatable to trying to convince Bill and Steve to open
source Windows.
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
