Why do you use (obviously flawed) research methods?
My method is to ask other people to do it for me. I use that method
because it is efficient. Its results are accurate, too.However, when a person tells me his OS is free, I have not always
checked. Sometimes I just took his word for it. The problems that
have been reported here in various free systems (and, mostly,
corrected) show I need to discuss the criteria more carefully with
them.Why are you replying on
everybody else to point these things you to you?Because that's the efficient way to do it. This is a matter of fixing
bugs. I don't read the source code of Emacs over again each month
looking for bugs. That would be prohibitively difficult. So I wait
for people to report bugs. It's the same for these problems.Pretty much everybody i know will check their email just before going to bed
and pretty just after they wake up. Why do you take so long then? Why are
you so disconnected from this computer world?I get so much email that the process of checking my email takes all day.
| Heiko Carstens | [patch -mm] s390: struct bin_attribute changes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
