Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: johan beisser
Date: Sunday, January 6, 2008 - 3:08 pm

On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Good Good wrote:


They're not willing to route a /64 to you?



Kind of. My understanding is you want to know if you can just accept  
the /64 traffic, and simply pass it through the firewall, while it's  
acting as a NAT for IPv4 traffic. My inclination is "no, that's not  
possible." I suspect it can be done though.


I think you could redirect v6 traffic from the external interface to  
the internal one. My concern is that you bypass the firewall. You may  
want to simply bridge, but I'd filter IPv6 just as much as IPv4.


brconfig(8) would configure the bridges, but I believe you'd be pretty  
much screwed on the routing and NAT once you do that.

You could bridge between the external interface, an internal tun/gif,  
and the internal interface, then route all v6 traffic to the tun/gif.  
it'd require some interesting work with route(8), though.


Just a thought, you could set up a non-bridging "route" label in pf,  
forwarding all IPv6 traffic to a bridged "virtual" interface with the  
internal interface. It's horribly complex, even in just thinking it out.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Good Good, (Sun Jan 6, 12:09 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Marc Balmer, (Sun Jan 6, 2:06 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, johan beisser, (Sun Jan 6, 3:08 pm)
Re: NAT IPV4 and bridge only IPV6, Claudio Jeker, (Sun Jan 6, 4:26 pm)