> > - vendor A sells hardware that requires a firmwareIn that case, it would be illegal for you to distribute the firmware, so naturally you don't. No argument there. But what about the different case where the company permits redistribution of the binary firmware, but does not release source code. Would OpenBSD distribute the firmware in that case?
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Cabot, Mason B | Ext3 vs NTFS performance |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Alan Cox | [PATCH 00/76] Queued TTY Patches |
git: | |
| Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Ken Pratt | Re: pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Wink Saville | Using git with Eclipse |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Mayuresh Kathe | Re: What is our ultimate goal?? |
| frantisek holop | booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom |
| Didier Wiroth | how can I "find xyz | xargs tar" ... like gtar |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Sven Wegener | [PATCH 2/5] ipvs: Use ERR_PTR for returning errors from make_receive_sock() and ma... |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [bug, netconsole, SLUB] BUG skbuff_head_cache: Poison overwritten |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH 2/3] [UDP]: Restore missing inDatagrams increments |
