On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
You have not answered at all, you have answered to other people so that
you could dodge my embarassing question instead of explaining why it is
different to do the exact same thing when you are from the FSF.
According to YOU, it is okay to have emacs and gcc run on a proprietary
system as it allows more people to run free software. How is it that it
is wrong to allow more people to run a free system by giving them links
to proprietary software if it encourages them to keep their free system
instead of switching to a proprietary one ?
By providing emacs and gcc for windows you encourage people to run just
a few free applications with proprietary system and (many) tools, while
we just give people the freedom to install a proprietary application on
top of a free system with free tools.
> Anyways, most of your emails have been so rude that in afterthought I
I try hard to keep my emails insult-free, saying that they are rude for
helping you avoid embarassing questions is what makes you a troll. Just
like your friend Stallman, you play on words and act like a victim if a
person points at the flaws in your reasonning, grow up.
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Christoph Lameter | [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support) |
| Chuck Ebbert | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Hugh Dickins | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
