On 04/01/2008, at 8:19 AM, Brad Tilley wrote:I agree that after a single pass of zeroes, getting anything but zeroes from a fully working, unaltered drive is not going to happen. But if you remove the digital logic which masks residual signals via thresholds used to determine at what point a 1 is considered a 1 and a 0 a 0, then perhaps 1's and 0's could be restored from some drives. Through the use of a replacement device that samples each bit with a bit depth greater than 1, allowing analysis to interpret what I would have thought would not be constant uniform samples. I think more importantly, if it is comparatively very cheap to erase a drive in a paranoid manner and the leaking of that data could cost a fortune, then the comparatively small cost of paranoid erasure could be a risk worth taking. Shane
| Christoph Lameter | [04/14] vcompound: Core piece |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH take 2] UBIFS - new flash file system |
git: | |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Adam Piatyszek | [BUG] git send-email brakes patches with very long lines |
| Junio C Hamano | [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4 |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| David B. | find -exec {} help |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Daniel Ouellet | sysctl kern.maxproc help needed |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Framstag | ftp-error: bind: Address already in use? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: will linux use swap partition AND swap file at the same time |
| sharpe | A modified rawrite.c for your consideration |
