> But I think the FPGAs in products are more like the possible computer
> in my microwave oven: nobody installs software in them, so they might
> as well be circuits.Really? All those wifi/raid/cpu/etc cards/chips out there that need
"firmware", you think they're not a mix of both microcontroller code and
other binary bits that configure an ASIC or FPGA?I am not a hardware expert; I don't know sort of hardware the firmware
blobs run on. I will presume you're right.Whether it runs on a computer or an FPGA, either way it's a program.
So the next crucial question is, do users normally install programs on
that device? For some devices, the answer is no. However, if the
firmware is stored in a file on the disk, and the system downloads it
into the device, the answer to that question is yes.That is the case where I object to the non-free firmware blobs.
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tejun Heo | [PATCH 2/5] sysfs: simplify sysfs_rename_dir() |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes |
| Dave Hansen | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Thomas Gleixner | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
