On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
quoted text
> On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms@1407.org> wrote:
> > > Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
> > > proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
> > > others?
> >
> > Because for me it is proprietary when I can't run it in a commercial
> > context.
> 
> you clearly don't know what proprietary means.  if you don't
> understand the big words, stop using them.  you also totally failed to
> comprehend the license.

No, I understood it quite well.

quoted text
> what i find even more hysterical is your claim that running a 5 year
> old rogue clone is needed to get your work done.

What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against commercial usage make it
proprietary, not that I need that piece of software.

Rui

-- 
Or not.
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 4th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?