Hello,
We're all tired of explaining to Richard Stallman about how he's wrong.
It somehow isn't registering with him, that, or he's not willing to
accept his position of being wrong.Either ways, by replying to his emails we are creating more noise than
required and giving him more importance than is due.Could we all please stop responding to his emails as well as emails
from trollers like Rui Seabra?Lets just ignore them and focus on our war cry of "Shut-up and Hack".
As a special power, let only Theo respond to Stallman's emails, that
way there isn't a lot of commotion and only the heavy weights slug it
out.And for heaven's sake, please don't respond to this email on the list,
if you feel strongly about it, mail me offlist.Best,
~Mayuresh
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more dr... |
| Philipp Marek | Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
git: | |
| Krishna Kumar | [PATCH 9/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Implement batching |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
