> In addition, I thought that OpenSolaris was just a kernel, but it

    > looks like the question had in mind a whole system.  This

    > miscommunication has the effect of making my statement appear to be an

    > endorsement of a system.
    Huh?  OpenSolaris is just a kernel
That's what I thought.  It _is_ free software, what there is of it.

But it isn't a usable solution.  That's what I meant at the time.
    Someone like you is not allowed to spread mistruths like this in the

    media.
"Spread mistruths" is a distorted way to describe a couple of

misunderstandings.  And as far as I know there is no way to forbid

anyone to do that.  If I knew a way, I would do it.
    Since you did it three times so rapidly, I am calling you a liar.
Mistakes are not lies.  And these mistakes were misunderstandings

anyway.
      And

    since you refuse to undo your commercial support in Emacs and GCC, I

    am going to call you a hypocrite.
I'm following the same principles that I apply to others.

I've explained both these principles and my actions; the readers

can judge all aspects for themselves.