login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
openbsd-misc
»
2008
»
January
»
31
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Todd Alan Smith <tas-misc-openbsd@...>
To: ropers <ropers@...>
Cc: <misc@...>, Ted Unangst <ted.unangst@...>
Subject:
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 9:23 pm
On Jan 29, 2008 9:20 PM, ropers wrote:
quoted text
> On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
> > by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
>
> I've always just clicked "Delete" instead. I don't acutally know
> Gmail's spam filter algorithm, but I've always avoided marking
> anything coming through via misc@ as spam, because I've a strong hunch
> that Gmail uses individual users' spam reporting data in future mail
> filtering for everybody. I'm afraid that if I were to mark anything
> sent to misc@ as spam, then Gmail might eventually stop delivering
> misc@ emails to me and everybody else. Maybe I'm overly careful, but
> it doesn't hurt much to click "Delete" instead of "Report spam".
Same here. I've always figured better safe than sorry.
Todd
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Test Limerick, please ignore
, Darrin Chandler
, (Mon Jan 28, 10:06 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Edd Barrett
, (Tue Jan 29, 8:07 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Peter N. M. Hansteen
, (Tue Jan 29, 3:03 am)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Marc Balmer
, (Tue Jan 29, 8:30 am)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Denny White
, (Tue Jan 29, 12:40 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Zbigniew Baniewski
, (Tue Jan 29, 2:38 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Denny White
, (Tue Jan 29, 10:39 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, J.C. Roberts
, (Tue Jan 29, 7:22 pm)
Re: Test pedantry, please ignore
, William Boshuck
, (Tue Jan 29, 10:52 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Zbigniew Baniewski
, (Tue Jan 29, 7:28 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Darrin Chandler
, (Tue Jan 29, 6:33 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Marti Martinez
, (Tue Jan 29, 5:47 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Ted Unangst
, (Tue Jan 29, 8:07 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, ropers
, (Tue Jan 29, 11:20 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Todd Alan Smith
, (Wed Jan 30, 9:23 pm)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Darrin Chandler
, (Tue Jan 29, 9:55 am)
Re: Test Limerick, please ignore
, Peter N. M. Hansteen
, (Tue Jan 29, 9:50 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Vu Pham
Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Andrew Morton
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 28/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 3 (client side)
David Miller
Re: htb parallelism on multi-core platforms
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
620 guests
online.
Online users
extondentist01
Syndicate