The condition your wife is subject to, IMO, is _very_ unusual and
deserves better study...I'm increasing the "off-topicness" of this thread, but Daniel is right.
If your wife is more sensitive to higher frequencies, it should be more
easier to isolate her from electromagnetic fields. Lower frequency
radiation, like the 50 or 60hz coming from our electrical power networks
is more capable of penetrating metallic (or other conductive material) sheets.So, it's probably more likely that she's sensitive to other classes of
electrical
devices, which should be given more attention... One thing that can
be an issue is tje fact of digital circuits running at higher speed
(gigahertz range)
tends to consume more electrical power, raising the amperage running
in your electrical wires, and, subsequently, the 50 or 60hz electrical field
in close range.The digital watch clock is puzzling: surely the quartz cristal inside
nearly every
digital clock isn't in the gigaherts range AND they consume very low power...
The proximity to her body can be a factor...On 1/30/08, Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| jjohansen | [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| holzheu | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 36/37] dccp: Initialisation and type-checking of feature sysctls |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
