On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:02:40PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:

quoted text
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:

> > Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and

> > you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling

> > OpenBSD as not compliant with your interpretation of the word "free",

> > which we don't give a farthing for.

>

> He only doesn't want to *recommend* OpenBSD because of the ports tree

> distributing some (however few exceptions those are) proprietary software.

Not interesting what he recommends.  I don't know how often I need to

repeat this to you.  You really can stop your pavlov responses (ding

ding, start salivating).
>

quoted text
> He's not labelling OpenBSD non-free, just non-free-friendly because some

> non-free are distributed in the ports site.

That's dumb and many people have told you so.  It doesn't matter how

often you try to make it sound good it is still dumb.
>

quoted text
> Now, you may disagree with his non-recommendation, but you're

> misinterperting what's being said completely, and perhaps giving a worse

> judgement of his words than what he "did" (depending on the point of view).

We don't care.  We want him and his bs to go away and leave us alone.

He can promote thurd all day long or not, whatever.
>

quoted text
> Rui

>

> (ps: if someone wants to answer back with insults just shove it, ok? I'm

> a fan of the Free Software operating system called OpenBSD and it's

> policy on pro-active security)

Then stop replying.  I am pretty sure people will not let you have the

last word on this.  You are spouting crap and people are tired of

listening to it.
>

quoted text
> --

> Fnord.

> Today is Pungenday, the 3rd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174

> + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown

> + Whatever you do will be insignificant,

> | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi

> + So let's do it...?