On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:50:27PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
So basically, as long as you can adapt your rules conveniently its ok ?
According to this new rule, how comes it is a drawback to provide users
with the freedom to install proprietary applications if it makes them
use more free software (i.e: users installing OpenBSD because they know
they will be able to achieve some task vs. people installing Windows
because they are unable to achieve the same task under OpenBSD) ?
If we don't provide some proprietary app, wouldn't we discourage use of
a free system by forcing users to chose another system ? Or are the FSF
rules bending again so that its ok for you but not for us ?
> > - What makes you think you are smarter than anybody just
That's probably because I am not smart enough, I am not 100% pure.
--
Gilles Chehade
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: Strange Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK complaints (was: Bug#513695: fetchma... |
