A professional peer of mine wrote the following article: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23417 which contains the following paragraph: Google's hired great open source developers from projects like Linux, Firefox, Samba and Apache. They all still have ties back into those projects. Now these key hires can help influence open source development projects that happen to indirectly benefit Google. Plus, open source developers would love to help improve their projects and displace Microsoft. A win-win. I'd like to ask the community what they think: Is the hiring of open source star coders in expectation of ancillary benefit from their influence in Open Source projects a win-win form of "voting with your feet" or is it an ethical conflict? I'm curious how we all see this. -- Jack J. Woehr Director of Development Absolute Performance, Inc. jwoehr@absolute-performance.com 303-443-7000 ext. 527
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Luciano Rocha | usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
