On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:

quoted text
> Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and

> you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling

> OpenBSD as not compliant with your interpretation of the word "free",

> which we don't give a farthing for.

He only doesn't want to *recommend* OpenBSD because of the ports tree

distributing some (however few exceptions those are) proprietary software.
He's not labelling OpenBSD non-free, just non-free-friendly because some

non-free are distributed in the ports site.
Now, you may disagree with his non-recommendation, but you're

misinterperting what's being said completely, and perhaps giving a worse

judgement of his words than what he "did" (depending on the point of view).
Rui
(ps: if someone wants to answer back with insults just shove it, ok? I'm

a fan of the Free Software operating system called OpenBSD and it's

policy on pro-active security)
--

Fnord.

Today is Pungenday, the 3rd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174

+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown

+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,

| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi

+ So let's do it...?