On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
quoted text
> Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and
> you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling
> OpenBSD as not compliant with your interpretation of the word "free",
> which we don't give a farthing for.

He only doesn't want to *recommend* OpenBSD because of the ports tree
distributing some (however few exceptions those are) proprietary software.

He's not labelling OpenBSD non-free, just non-free-friendly because some
non-free are distributed in the ports site.

Now, you may disagree with his non-recommendation, but you're
misinterperting what's being said completely, and perhaps giving a worse
judgement of his words than what he "did" (depending on the point of view).

Rui

(ps: if someone wants to answer back with insults just shove it, ok? I'm
a fan of the Free Software operating system called OpenBSD and it's
policy on pro-active security)

-- 
Fnord.
Today is Pungenday, the 3rd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?