> As for Intels use of non-free software, I am sorry for them, and I hope
> that someday they will be able to move to free software.Is this "hope" reasonable or logical?
Totally not. Intel just wants the best software they can afford to get their
chips as fast and as good as possible to market.Since I do not make decisions for them, I can only say that I am
disappointed with their values. But even if Intel does not value
freedom very much, they may someday have freedom if free software
is sufficiently accepted in the world around them.
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| David Miller | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
| Tony Lindgren | [PATCH 48/90] ARM: OMAP: I2C-1 init fix for 2430 |
git: | |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
