On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:44:12PM +0100, Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
> Now, admin here is taking security a bit too seriously and it's not
What's wrong with base lpd with a remote printer entry in printcap?
Unless I need wierd access controll, I only use LPD + apsfilter. Then
again, I never had a printer hanging on the network, I use an old 486 as
a print server running its own LPD and apsfilter.
If you need to spit printer-specific data to the printer from lpr and
need to convert first, you could chain printcap entries: print to one
queue, it's filter does the conversion and spits it to another queue
that sends it out to the remote printer.
Or just install LPRng.
I've never used cups.
Doug.
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerhard Pircher | 3c59x: shared interrupt problem |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
