Joel Sing wrote:

quoted text
> Note that that exploit is for versions earlier than 1.1.4.b3 - the

> previous ports version was 1.1.4.b4, which one would presume is

> patched for this vulnerability. Obviously this assumes that no other

> exploits have been found since version 1.1.4.b4.

The audit I was shown stated that vulnerable versions are prior to

"1.1.4-bs". These version numbers seem to follow a pattern I don't

understand. Would I be correct in interpreting "bs" as later than

"b3p1"?