Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Cc: 'Axton' <axton.grams@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 2:28 am

Axton wrote:

Yes, I understand that packages are not audited as the base system is.
It just seemed unlikely to me that the PoPToP version in packages would
remain unchanged through 6 different releases of OpenBSD if it was known
to have a buffer overflow.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Richard P. Koett, (Tue Jan 29, 12:05 am)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Jan 29, 5:39 am)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Joel Sing, (Tue Jan 29, 8:00 am)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Richard P. Koett, (Tue Jan 29, 1:20 pm)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Jan 29, 1:51 pm)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Richard P. Koett, (Tue Jan 29, 2:32 pm)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Eduardo Tongson, (Tue Jan 29, 2:16 am)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Richard P. Koett, (Tue Jan 29, 3:04 am)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Axton, (Tue Jan 29, 12:59 am)
Re: PoPToP Vulnerability Question, Richard P. Koett, (Tue Jan 29, 2:28 am)